THAT ENGLISH TEACHER
  • Home
    • The Personal/College Essay
  • Class Blogs
    • English IV Class Blog Period A
    • English IV Class Blog Period B
    • AP Literature Class Blog Period C
    • English IV Class Blog Period E
    • English IV Class Blog Period F
  • For Your Viewing Pleasure
  • Contact Me
    • About Me...

AP Literature and Composition Blog

Discussion Question: The Feminist Critical Lens and the Inherent Danger of the Female Form (PRIMARY ONLY).

3/5/2025

 
Picture
Victor Frankenstein initially agrees to create a female companion for the Creature, believing it will end the Creature’s suffering and prevent further violence. However, as he works, he becomes haunted by the possible consequences of his actions. In a moment of panic, he destroys the female, declaring, “She, who in all probability was to become a thinking and reasoning animal, might refuse to comply with a compact made before her creation” (Shelley 147). Here, Victor acknowledges that the female Creature would have agency and might reject the Creature as her mate, rendering his efforts futile. He also fears that together they might pose an even greater threat to humanity, perhaps even reproducing and creating a new race of beings beyond his control: “A race of devils would be propagated upon the earth who might make the very existence of the species of man a condition precarious and full of terror” (147).

How do Victor’s justifications for destroying the female Creature reveal his anxieties about power, control, and the natural order? An interesting activity is using a Feminist Critical Lens to critique these two sentences. Why might a female "thinking and reasoning animal [...] refuse to comply"?  What is Mary Shelley suggesting when she invokes the idea of this "thinking and reasoning" creature rejecting the agreements made by others and thus producing an entire "race of devils [...] who might make the very existence of the species of man [...] precarious and full of terror"? Why is this "thinking and reasoning" creature refusing to comply to society's expectation of her role as a mate so much more monstrous than the first creature? Do you see a paradox between Victor Frankenstein's worries about this female creature and his ever-compliant love, Elizabeth? Elaborate.

Primary Blog Expectations (respond to the prompt above): 200-250 words, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and 
be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Sunday night 3-9-2025!

Discussion Question: Literary Illusions

2/28/2025

36 Comments

 
Picture
Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay
To mould me man? Did I solicit thee
From darkness to promote me?
                                                           -John Milton, Paradise Lost, X, 743-745 (1667)


The creature reads John Milton's epic poem, Paradise Lost (1667). Milton's epic poem tells the story of how Adam and Eve live in peaceful harmony until they are seduced by Satan into eating from the Tree of Knowledge and are punished by being banished from the Garden of Eden. While reading Paradise Lost, the creature reports that he initially identifies with the character of "Adam" insofar as both are "united by no link to any other being in existence" (132). However, the creature also identifies with the character of "Satan": "Many times I considered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me" (132). Do you think the character bears a greater resemblance to Adam or Satan? Why?

Primary Blog Expectations (respond to the prompt above): 150-200 words, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Sunday night, 3/2/2025! 

Secondary Blog Response Expectations (read everyone's primary responses, select two that interest you, and respond to their ideas): 100-150 words EACH, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Tuesday night, 3/4/2025!

Extra Information: If you are unfamiliar with Paradise Lost by John Milton, Dr. Moore of Saint Thomas University will give you an excellent and relatively brief overview considering the complexity of this famous poem. As always, remember that this video lecture is Dr. Moore's interpretation of Milton's epic classic through the lens of sociopolitical thought. You may find that you have your own interpreation if you choose to read it.

Summary: Paradise Lost, an epic poem by John Milton is arguably the greatest poem written in English. What is Paradise Lost about? Paradise Lost tells the story of the Garden of Eden, God's creation of humanity, Eve's temptation by Satan and Adam's subsequent temptation by Eve. It also tells the story of the War in Heaven, when Satan rebelled against God and fell to Hell. Paradise Lost is an extraordinary epic poem, its major themes include freedom, knowledge, justice, providence, republicanism and monarchy. This podcast provides a summary of some of Paradise Lost's major themes as well as some strategies for reading Milton's epic poem (GreatBooksProf).
36 Comments

Lens and Artifact (Primary Blog Entry ONLY)

1/8/2021

 
Picture

What is a Lens and Artifact Analysis?

Look closely at literature, and you may see a new world below the surface. In high school or college, a teacher may ask you to do this by writing a lens essay. A lens essay is a type of comparative paper that analyzes one text through the viewpoints expressed in another. Composing an effective one is difficult even for the most seasoned of writers. However, it is an incredible intellectual exercise through which you will not only improve your writing skills but your critical reading and thinking skills as well.

Here are a few questions to consider when analyzing the content of your focus text: How does the lens text serve to shed light on the second text? Does it criticize it or support it? What is a new or different perspective that you can grapple with by using this lens? Does this new perspective strengthen your own original understanding or does it challenge your ideas?

Your Blog Post Prompt:
First, you are NOT WRITING AN ESSAY! You are simply considering how a lens allows you to play with analysis. This is not intended to be a formal analysis, but merely intellectual exploration.

Your lens is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Now that you have read and analyzed this novel, consider the events on Wednesday, January 6th. How does your understanding of Frankenstein illuminate this historic event? How can you parse these events using Shelley's characters and themes?

Now, here comes the fun part!

All critical thinkers consider multiple facets of an issue. I am asking you to do the same. You may feel that you strongly align with one side of this situation. For this part of the exercise, you must use the same lens to illuminate the opposing viewpoint. What is their Creature? Who is their Victor Frankenstein? Can you make any parallels?

Additionally, you can take this a step further and consider abstract concepts: Capitalism, Fascism, Socialism, Nationalism, Patriotism, Black Lives Matter, All Lives Matter, your own ideas, YOU NAME IT. This exercise is a good exercise in understanding where people come from. You should practice it all the time.

This is an exercise in critical thinking only. There is no debate here, other than with yourself. This exercise is not intended to change minds, only to understand opposing viewpoints. Remember the key question here: WHY do people believe they things they do?

Good luck!!

Primary Blog Expectations (respond to the prompt above): 200-250 words, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Sunday night 1-10-2020! 

Picture

Independent Reading Blog #3

1/25/2019

 

Today, I would like for you to read and respond to the article, "In the Minds of Others" by Keith Oatley. You should read and annotate the print article that I give you, but I will also include a link here. This article further develops the ideas from Independent Reading Blog #2 and will be of use later when we finish our Independent Reading Unit.

Your critical analysis of this article should:
     -briefly summarize the main points of the article
     -identify the author's argument
     -evaluate the author's success by analyzing how the author uses:
          1. textual evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims
          2. reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence
        3. stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed
     -conclude with a strong comment upon the value of the author's topic/argument.

Requirements:
     -typed, MLA style, 500-1,000 words (about 2 to 4 pages)
     -posted here on the classroom blog
     -AND to Turnitin by 11:59pm on Sunday night, 1/27/2019

Picture
Click on the image above to go to an electronic copy of "In the Minds of Others" by Keith Oatley.

Independent Reading Blog #2

1/16/2019

 

"Literature’s Emotional Lessons:
​Grappling with the way books make students feel—not just analytical skills—should be part of the high-school English curriculum." - Andrew Simmons

PictureERIC AUDRAS / PHOTOALTO / CORBIS
Now that you have experienced a significant chunk of your Independent Reading Book, please read this article (linked through the image on the left) and use it as a lens to say something about your chosen novel. This is the basis of a critical lens paper (where you use a nonfiction article to comment upon an artifact that you have read closely) and is a cornerstone of college-level analysis. We are just barely brushing upon this type of writing here, but you should consider this article carefully as you continue to expose yourself to good books.

Please note: I realize that you have just started reading your IR Books, but you can still apply the concepts from this article to your reading so far.

​
Requirements:
Plan and compose a short essay (250-300 words - 100 points) that addresses the points from the nonfiction article as it applies to the book you are reading. I understand that you have just begun your book, but you should still be able to touch upon some of the finer points of your reading in order for the nonfiction article to apply. To do this short essay well, you will need to be very clear about what the author's argument is in the nonfiction article. Focus on this task as you read Simmon's work and then apply his argument to your novel. How does your novel address his point/s? 

Due Sunday night (1/20) by 11:59 pm!

    Blog Post Rubric

    Picture

    Archives

    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    February 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    A Doll's House
    Afghanistan
    Anton Chekhov
    As I Lay Dying
    A Thousand Splendid Suns
    Barbara Kingsolver
    Biology
    Charlotte Bronte
    Chemistry
    Class Division
    Community
    Congo/Zaire
    Contrasts
    Cormac McCarthy
    Critical Lens
    Cross Cultural Misconceptions
    Cross-Cultural Misconceptions
    Dystopia
    Ethics
    Family
    Frankenstein
    Gateshead
    Gender Roles
    Gender Study
    Hamlet
    Henrik Ibsen
    Hesitation
    Hope And Despair
    Hubris
    Humanity
    Imagery
    Imagination
    Independent Reading
    Invention
    Jane Eyre
    Khaled Hosseini
    Literary Analysis
    Literature
    Mary Shelley
    Morality
    Objectivity V. Subjectivity
    Paradise Lost
    Parent Child Relationships
    Parent-Child Relationships
    Perseverance
    Perspective
    Pleasure Reading
    Poetry
    Psychology
    Radiolab
    Reading
    Relationships
    Religion
    Right Vs. Wrong
    Ritual
    Rudy Francisco
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge
    Sanity
    Science
    Shelter
    Soliloquy
    Suspense
    Symbolism
    Tennyson
    The Lady With The Little Dog
    The Poisonwood Bible
    The Rime Of The Ancient Mariner
    The Road
    Ulysses
    Virtual Poetry Unit
    Week 1 Poetry Activity
    William Faulkner
    Women's Roles

    RSS Feed

  • Home
    • The Personal/College Essay
  • Class Blogs
    • English IV Class Blog Period A
    • English IV Class Blog Period B
    • AP Literature Class Blog Period C
    • English IV Class Blog Period E
    • English IV Class Blog Period F
  • For Your Viewing Pleasure
  • Contact Me
    • About Me...