|
The words that Shelley uses to describe Frankenstein's process of creation suggest that it is analogous to pregnancy and childbirth. Just as pregnant women in the 18th century were confined to a room before going into labor, Frankenstein describes himself as "emaciated with confinement" and beset by a "slow fever" (Shelly 38, 41). He repeatedly refers to his "midnight labors" and anticipates the day when his "labors would [...] end" (Shelley 55, 57). Why might Shelley compare the male protagonist's process of creation with a woman's biological process of giving birth? What is the purpose of the comparison? In your response, be sure to reference at least one of the many footnotes that enrich this portion of the novel.
Primary Blog Expectations (respond to the prompt above): 200-250 words, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm on Sunday night! Secondary Blog Response Expectations (read everyone's primary responses, select two that interest you, and respond to their ideas): 100-150 words EACH, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Monday night!
30 Comments
Elisabeth Wollman
12/7/2025 12:32:53 pm
In his quest for fame and glory, Victor Frankenstein discovers a way to create biological life from human corpses through an unspecified process of “animation.” Throughout this solitary “labor,” he becomes“emaciated by confinement” and overtaken by a “slow fever,” —physical suffering that parallels the effects of pregnancy and childbirth on women (Shelley 34, 38, 41). In her comparison of Victor’s process of scientific creation to women’s biological process of childbirth, Shelley highlights the dangers of opposing natural processes for the sake of glory and ambition.
Reply
Elisabeth Wollman
12/7/2025 12:34:42 pm
**Word Count: 339
Reply
Mélanie Hahnemann
12/7/2025 10:33:32 pm
I loved how your analysis of Shelley's comparison between Victor's creation and traditional childbirth shows how unnatural his process was. I mainly liked how you emphasize Victor's physical statements "slow fever" and "emancipation" as a distorted reflection of pregnancy. This parallel helps build Shelley's warning about attempting to get power without being guided on the moral responsibilities that lead to destruction. You also mention Victor abandoning the creature at its birth, which mirrors the consequences of child neglect. Shelley suggests that creating someone whether natural or unnatural will always require guidance rather than fear. Maybe if Victor had shown compassion and interest, the events that follow.
Reply
Marie Durocher
12/10/2025 08:28:26 am
I really liked the way you mentioned how neglect during a child’s early ages often has an effect on their emotions and morals, as seen through Victor and his creation. Shelley really shows this through the creature, who likely started off wanting connection but then turns destructive after Victor abandons him out of fear. Since Victor fled the moment the creature came to life, it was basically guaranteed that the creature would grow up without any type of guidance or affection, which are crucial in the development years. I think your connection to how children suffer when parents fail to care for them is very strong and also helps show that the creature wasn’t necessarily “born bad” but became it because he was left alone. Victor is more responsible for the creature’s actions than he realizes, and simply leaving him alone was not a wise decision.
Reply
Jiang Hui
12/7/2025 03:34:13 pm
Throughout volume one of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein experiences a mental decline after his successful attempt at reanimating a corpse. Driven by a desire to simultaneously gain recognition and end the human “disease” that is death, Frankenstein spends his time abroad confined in his laboratory working on his creation of “life.” This task drives him to sickness. He becomes tormented by his actions and haunted by his mistakes. Shelley compares Frankenstein’s process of creation with a woman’s biological process of giving birth. This comparison helps emphasize the disturbing creation process our protagonist undergoes in trying to bring life to something that has long gone without it, and the parallels between mother and child relationships.
Reply
Matilda Montana
12/7/2025 08:23:16 pm
First of all I love how you made a timeline. But maybe Victor's situation is not as parallel as we think. Maybe he was going through postpartum depression of being a single father raising the creature on his own, causing him to abandon the creature not just physically but mentally, causing him to distance himself for the creature from the basement to the cause to the point were Victor couldn't take it anymore and decided to run away from the creature and go to the countryside, leaving the creature by himself to raise itself, making him angry and sad maybe causing him to kill William in the end.
Reply
Elisabeth Wollman
12/7/2025 08:45:46 pm
Your mention of how the creature "absorbs" Victor's disapproval and how that mirrors the way young children react to behaviors from their parents is interesting and very true! Oftentimes adults underestimate the emotional intelligence of their children, which in many cases leads to forms of neglect and abandonment because they believe their child cannot differentiate between good and bad, wrong and right. In many cases, however, this is what leads to children either one, develop the same behaviors they witnessed in their parents, or two, harbor resentment and rebel against them. Even if they cannot completely comprehend complex concepts such as abuse or neglect, that doesn't mean children still aren't affected by them, which is the mistake that Victor makes with his creature. His sole purpose of creation is to make a discovery, achieve glory, and have something that only he owns; yet, these motives are deeply flawed and corrupt, as one should not aim to create life for personal gain. Bringing life into the world should be conceived from selfless, well-intended motives, but with Victor, we see how the contrary can ultimately lead to mass catastrophe and destruction.
Reply
Huang Lu
12/7/2025 07:05:01 pm
In Volume I, Victor Frankenstein pursues glory through trials of obsession and mental deterioration. He resides in his lab seemingly forever, without consideration for his family or well-being. However, this drives him to successfully form life into a creature, despite the overwhelming exertion and sickness of this process. Shelley compares Frankenstein’s experiment to a woman’s biological birth to draw an emotional parallel between Frankenstein’s scientific ambition and the real motherhood of responsibility.
Reply
Mayumi Kimura
12/8/2025 06:54:35 pm
I agree with your comparison between how a mother takes care of their creations to how Victor has taken care of his creation, Frankenstein. I feel like Mary Shelley challenges the idea of male dominance in nurturing roles and suggests that men cannot seize the biological role of women. The childbirth parallels further strengthen Shelley's critique of Victor's unethical pursuit of glory. I love your word choice " This realization highlights Frankenstein’s horrified gap between idealism and actual responsibility of care for a living being." I couldn't have said it better. It it clear that Shelley wants to emphasize Victor's failure in taking responsibility of his actions.
Reply
RUPA BAI FURDOONJI
12/7/2025 07:08:00 pm
Reply
Elisabeth Wollman
12/7/2025 08:29:15 pm
I like that last sentence, "...the result can be destructive for both the creator and creation," because it captures the essence of one of Frankenstein's main themes—the dangers of ambition and discovery. Throughout the novel, the audience observes how Victor's pursuit of discovery and glory impacts both himself and his creation; Victor is so completely consumed by his discovery that he neglects his health, family, and the creature itself, while the creation faces abandonment from its creator, eventually leading to its moral decline. Nobody benefits from Victor's ambitions, and in fact, everyone close to him suffers from his recklessness. While written centuries ago, I believe this message to be more pertinent than ever; with the rise in modern technology and artificial intelligence, society must decide if it wants to embrace these new changes, which arguably go against human nature and the systems humanity has worked so arduously to establish and maintain. Will we heed Shelley's warnings and proceed with caution as to not meet that same fate as Victor, or will we illustrate his same recklessness?
Reply
Mayumi Kimura
12/7/2025 07:24:44 pm
Mary Shelley used language associated with pregnancy and childbirth to describe Victor Frankenstein's process of creating the creature to highlight the unnaturalness and to judge his attempt to take a role traditionally held by women. Throughout volume one, Victor describes himself as "emaciated with confinement” and during the eighteenth century were confined in a room before giving birth. This draws parallels from a woman giving birth to a baby and Victor giving life to Frankenstein. Furthermore, Shelley also deepens this comparison by referencing “midnight labors”, during childbirth, labor marks the beginning of becoming a parent and gaining those responsibilities, but for Victor labor represents the moments of torment from his own self-creation. By using words typically associated with women giving birth it builds a strong comparison between mothers and a child and Victor and Frankenstein.
Reply
Jiang Hui
12/8/2025 06:13:15 pm
I think your point about comparison for emphasizing the danger of violating natural processes is especially interesting. Victor Frankenstein’s reanimating of a corpse is certainly unnatural and defies biological processes. However, as you mentioned, there is a parallel the life Frankenstein instills upon his creation and a woman giving birth to her own creation, a child. Is it perhaps Victor’s disruption of natural biological processes that curses him to his downfall? that traps him within the consequences of his actions? Perhaps, if he nurtured his creation just as a mother would her child, he would have avoided conflicts like the death of his poor brother William and the wrongful execution of Justine.
Reply
Matilda Montana
12/7/2025 07:54:39 pm
Victor Frankenstein uses his motivation for wisdom and glory by creating a human by using many human corpse pieces together, using "animation", which is so cool in one aspect, but also scary in another. Throughout his pregnancy, just before “labor”, he undergoes “emaciated by confinement” and becomes sick getting “slow fever”. This shows that sickness/physical deterring connects to pregnancy and childbirth. According to Shelley (38,34,41). The author compares Victor’s the process of the creation to women’s biological childbirth, Shelley shows the dangers and madness of opposing natural processes for the sake of glory and wisdom .
Reply
RUPA BAI FURDOONJI
12/8/2025 09:42:07 pm
I agree with your response that Victor's attempt at creation was fundamentally misaligned with the concept of childbirth due to his motivations and expectations. He approached the act as a grand pursuit of personal glory, His failure to anticipate the immense responsibilities of caregiving--expecting an immediately capable being rather than a dependent requiring nurturing like a baby -- underscores his unpreparedness. This oversight, fueled by ambition, manifested in his own physical and psychological distress, such as the fevers and unsettling dreams, serving as natural consequences of his defiance of responsible creation.
Reply
Huang Lu
12/8/2025 11:27:47 pm
The quote you depicted, “so miserably given life,” is insightful. Frankenstein gave life to the creature despite knowing the consequences of nurture and responsibility, contradicting the glory he highly values. His goal to gain God-like power by discovering secrets of life and death doesn’t hesitate if he is impotent to credibility. I also agree that Frankenstein should have shown empathy for the creature. I am sensitive towards the creature, unfamiliar with reality and its purpose of living. I believe Frankenstein can’t wish for prestige when not an ounce of him carries the patience to guide a newborn.
Reply
Mary Chilton noyes
12/7/2025 10:01:00 pm
Mary Shelley's description of Frankenstein's creation process closely mirrors the physical and emotional experience of pregnancy and childbirth, and this comparison highlights both the unnaturalness of Victor's actions and his inability to accept responsibility for them. Shelley repeatedly uses language associated with confinement and illness, Victor writes that he grew "emaciated with confinement" and was consumed by a "slow fever", descriptions that echo the physical toll pregnancy takes on the role of creator without understanding the consequences or sacrifices that typically accompany it. The comparison becomes even more meaningful when considering footnotes explaining how Shelley drew from early nineteenth-century anxieties surrounding maternal mortality and scientific hubris. By applying traditionally feminine imagery to a male scientist, Shelley exposes the unnatural inversion at the heart of Victor's experiment.
Reply
Mary Chilton Noyes
12/7/2025 10:03:23 pm
231 word count
Reply
Mélanie Hahnemann
12/7/2025 11:04:00 pm
I love how your response brings attention to the social and ethical implications of Victor's experiment. By isolating himself from his family, peers and even the scientific community, Victor not only violates nature on the reproductive process but he also ignores the use of scientific inquiry before an experiment. Your point about discovery being something that should be "shared and built upon" is very important because Victor's secrecy later contributed to the unfortunate events that later take place. The creature's moral decline isn't because he was born evil but rather because of how Victor refused to guide him into the life he brought him into. Which I think needs to be talked more about
Reply
Mayumi Kimura
12/8/2025 07:06:46 pm
Your insight on how Shelley feminized Victor both physically and mentally through the experience of pregnancy really stood out to me. I agree that this comparison highlighted the unnaturalness of this experiment. Victor wanted the power of this creation without thinking about the risk associated. This failed project reveals the horrors of pushing science beyond its limits. I feel like Shelley had a clear message: someone cannot claim the role of a creator without accepting the vulnerability that comes with it.
Reply
RUPA BAI FURDOONJI
12/8/2025 09:25:29 pm
I find your analysis compelling because it does an excellent job of explaining why Shelley chose this particular comparison, arguing that it's central to understanding Victor's moral failure and destructive nature of creation without compassion. I also think you did a great job with connecting Victor's actions to broader themes such as the lack of empathy in creation. Your description of Victor's illness and confinement support your claim about the parallels between creation and childbirth.
Reply
Frances Montresor Buchanan Allen Penniman
12/9/2025 05:22:21 pm
Here is a polished response with **no hyphens or dashes**, written in the same style as your previous reply (100–150 words):
Reply
Mélanie Hahneman
12/7/2025 10:08:42 pm
In the book Frankenstein, Mary Shelley's decision to describe Victor's creation process through the use of imagery that is known for being associated with women and pregnancy reveals his attempt to claim power over something that is typically reserved for women. Victor repeatedly categorizes his scientific work as a form of physical suffering, describing himself as "emaciated with confinement" or consumed by a "slow fever" during the time period he spent putting the creature together. These references mirror the actual physical pain pregnant women have experienced during pregnancy in the 18th century time period. Shelley further deepens the comparison by having Victor refer to his obsessive work as "midnight labors" and looking forward to the day his "labors would...end" this serves as language that evokes childbirth and the pain that comes with it.
Reply
Jiang Hui
12/8/2025 06:20:15 pm
I liked your specification on the juxtaposition of the natural process of giving birth to the “birth” of Victor’s creation. We often look at this idea through a lens of comparison, but it’s important to acknowledge the juxtaposing nature of Victor’s situation. I also liked your critique on the “life” that Victor supposedly gives to the creature. He abandons his creation on account of its haunting him and fails to give it the true nurturing upstart that a mother would give her children. Even after birthing this creation, Victor continuously fails to raise the creature and foster a possible relationship, likely leading to his demise.
Reply
Frances Montresor Buchanan Allen Penniman
12/9/2025 05:21:07 pm
I agree with your point that Shelley uses pregnancy imagery to show Victor trying to claim a power usually held by women, and I think this also hints at how deeply he ends up feeling connected to the Creature. Shelley’s use of terms like “confinement” and “midnight labors” does not just highlight his attempt to control creation. It also suggests that he experiences something similar to a parent waiting for a child. One footnote even explains that “confinement” referred to the period when pregnant women stayed indoors, which makes Victor’s situation feel even more like a twisted version of pregnancy. By giving him this almost maternal struggle, Shelley shows that Victor cannot escape the emotional weight of creating life, even though he immediately rejects the Creature.
Reply
Marie Durocher
12/8/2025 08:04:37 pm
Volume 1 of Frankenstein mainly focuses on Victor's process of creating the creature, beginning from his immense ambition to succeed to his fear when he finally does. Throughout the volume, Mary Shelley purposely describes Victor's process of creation in terms that mimic the experience of pregnancy and childbirth in order to demonstrate how Victor is trying to take a power that doesn't belong to him, that being the creation of life, an ability that is often seen as one of a woman.
Reply
Yoshioka Yayoi
12/9/2025 12:31:39 am
Mary Shelley might compare the male protagonist's process of creation with a woman's process of giving birth to explore themes of power, control, and responsibility. By drawing parallels between Victor Frankenstein creating the creature and a woman giving birth, Shelley may be highlighting the emotional and physical toll of creation. This comparison could also serve to challenge traditional gender roles and portray women as powerful creators in their own right.
Reply
Marie Durocher
12/10/2025 08:36:06 am
I think you made a really good point about how Shelly compares the process of Victor creating the creature and childbirth to show power, responsibility, and control. By writing in a way that parallels Victor’s experiences to pregnancy and labor, it shows that there is more to creation than just simply making something; you must also guide and nurture your creation. The quote you used about Victor “losing health and rest” really highlights this, showing that creation also has physical and emotional consequences. In addition, I liked how you said the comparison of Victor to a pregnant woman challenges traditional gender roles. The process of creation is often one associated with women through childbirth, but in this case, Victor’s process is described in terms that are related to childbirth, sort of portraying him as the woman and the creation as his offspring. This could be seen as Victor trying to take a power that does not belong to him, and this is later revealed as destructive. He fails to care for the creation, and as a result, it goes off and wreaks havoc by murdering WIlliam.
Reply
Frances Montresor Buchanan Allen Penniman
12/9/2025 05:18:31 pm
Shelley may compare Victor Frankenstein’s creation process to a woman’s pregnancy and childbirth because it helps show that Victor actually feels a kind of parental or even maternal connection to the Creature. When he talks about being “emaciated with confinement” or describes his “midnight labors,” it does not sound like a scientist doing an experiment. It sounds like someone waiting for a child to be born. That language makes Victor’s experience feel more emotional and personal, not just a cold scientific project.
Reply
Marie Curie
12/12/2025 11:46:38 pm
Mary Shelley compares Victor Frankenstein's creation to childbirth to make Victor's experiment feel like an unnatural version of childbirth. Although, Victor is a man, he takes on the traditional role of a woman by creating, carrying, and delivering life, but in a way that is incomplete, irresponsible, and ultimately disastrous.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Blog Post Rubric
Archives
December 2025
Categories
All
|

RSS Feed