THAT ENGLISH TEACHER
  • Home
  • Class Blogs
    • Academic Focus Class Blog
    • English IV Class Blog Period D
    • AP Literature Class Blog Period E
    • English IV Class Blog Period F
  • For Your Viewing Pleasure
  • Contact Me
    • About Me...
  • There There

AP Literature and Composition Blog

Frankenstein: Chapters 13-19

12/1/2020

25 Comments

 
Picture

Examine the Creature’s argument and his demand of Frankenstein. Is it reasonable? How does the creature formulate his argument and does he argue successfully in your opinion? If you were Frankenstein, would you agree to it? Why or why not? After you read Frankenstein’s actions in these chapters, what do you think of his actions? 

​Primary Blog Expectations (respond to the prompt above): 200-250 words, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Friday night 12-4-2020! 

Secondary Blog Response Expectations (read everyone's primary responses, select two that interest you, and respond to their ideas): 100-150 words EACH, minimal errors in grammar and usage, thoughtful and thorough writing. Please use the name you were assigned in class as your nom de plume and be sure to add word count. Due by 11:59pm Sunday night 12-6-2020!

25 Comments
Bessie Downse
12/4/2020 03:13:18 pm

Being completely exiled and isolated from the whole world is the kind of treatment a criminal or a villain deserves. It is a lifestyle that most people would not wish on their worst enemy. Unfortunately living the life of loneliness and heartbreak was Victor Frankenstien’s creature’s lifestyle. After being thrown away from all of humanity, the creature has only himself and nature too spend his days among. After sharing everything he has done in his life to Victor, he concludes his speech with a demand. He asked for a companion to spend his days with. HIs argument consists of making his creator feel sorry for causing his life to be this way, threatens him with more violence, but eventually promises to resort from all of humanity. He says, “I will revenge my injuries: if I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear…” (Shelley 129). However, he goes on to say, “If you consent, neither you nor any other human being shall ever see us again,” (Shelley 130). The creature was very strategic with how he went about asking for a companion. He made a huge, long speech about how everything he did in his life led up to this moment and tied every single event into his argument. Explaining all his heartbreaks and struggles were to make Victor feel like a bag guy, explaining how his violence was out of anger to his creator made him fear for future acts of violence, and the promise allows for comfort that it will never happen again. As shown in future chapters, this was a successful argument and Victor would have been a fool to say no.

Reply
Anne Elizabeth
12/8/2020 12:46:34 pm

"Being completely exiled and isolated from the whole world is the kind of treatment a criminal or a villain deserves". EEEHHHH! I don’t know about that one, Chief; I disagree with that statement right there because there are some people in the world who are introverted and love to spend (Me-time). Does that person become criminal or a villain just by separating or rebelling against the community. Don’t think so! Exactly, I sort of think this is the creature's first move in a way to, welp there’s no subtle way to say this. Take revenge due to the things he had to go through for a prolonged amount of time. Ultimately, an Antisocial person isn’t always an antagonist.

word count: 118

Reply
Sofya Kovalevskaya
12/10/2020 05:46:55 am

I agree with your opinion on the well-structured presentation of the monster’s request because I think that was a very key factor in trying to appeal to Frankenstein. I also agree with the fact that the creature had been very wronged in life by humans so creating a mate was a very good compromise to make it up to him. However, I also kind of understand Frankenstein’s point of view, and I don’t think he was necessarily a “fool” for declining the request in the end. This is because the lives of many individuals were at risk here. Frankenstein knew that he hadn’t taken care of the monster, and he felt guilty about it, therefore I think, his denial was a result of this overflowing guilt. Putting myself in Frankenstein’s shoes, I understand why he made that decision. This is because at the time, he had lost both William and Justine, therefore, he probably thought that making this mate may result in the loss of lives of many more humans, not just his family. It was a gamble and although I don’t really agree with his decision, it was a pretty reasonable one.

Word Count: 193

Reply
Fanny Rysan Mulford Hitchcock
12/4/2020 11:04:39 pm

The Creature was able to guilt Victor into granting the Creature's request of creating a female creature. He describes his life as "miserable" and lives as an outsider. He goes into great detail to discuss the people he was able to observe, including the DeLacey family. He thoroughly expressed his desire to be loved while watching them, and said, "...the greater became my desire to claim their protection and kindness; my heart yearned to be known and loved by these amiable creatures.." (Shelley 117). He wanted what Victor had: loving family and friends. The Creature's story allows Victor to see the true human side of his creation to show how he wants everything normal people do. The Creature also uses a scare tactic by saying, "...if I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear…" (Shelley 129). Victor's greatest fear seems to be that the Creature will do something horrendous. His suspicion about William was right, but who could be next? If Victor's fear is having his sense of normalcy taken away by his creation, will the Creature kill people like Henry Clerval as well?

Personally, I would have granted Frankenstein's request. I love learning about the human body, the opportunity to build two would be too good to pass up. Frankenstein's actions could have certainly been seen as extreme, especially when it came to homicide, but it could also be justifiable. I mean, what would you do if you were abandoned by the only person who you've ever known?

Word Count: 249

Reply
Maria Gugelberg von Moos
12/4/2020 11:29:34 pm

The creature's plea to Frankenstein was reasonable because after all that he had been through, all he wanted to do was be loved and accepted by another being. He just wanted to fit in and have a family, similar to the De Lacey's that he encountered earlier on. To have someone that would feel the same way and end up loving him, it would be an instant relief after all of the hatred and discrimination he's faced from humans. If I were Frankenstein, I wouldn't agree to his pleas. I do believe that the creature's offspring would be potentially dangerous as the creature has proven to have a tendency to kill. He even threatens Frankenstein that he will destroy him if he doesn't have a companion. The idea of the creature having offspring sounds like it could have a bad outcome because he could teach his children that humans are against them and to kill. It is evident that all the creature wants to do is be happy with a family of his own. He was even willing to move far away from civilization in exchange for a mate. Although they could be living by themselves in peace, there is a huge possibility that they will come across humans at one point. No one would know how the creature and his family would react to this situation, in part to his own past trauma that he probably instilled in his offspring.

Word Count: 241

Reply
Bessie Downse
12/6/2020 12:39:02 pm

I can see where you are coming from but I disagree completely. Personally, I believe that the creature hasn't given any thought to having an offspring. He craves showing love and affection, yes, but I do not think he has even thought anywhere outside of having a spouse to love. Additionally, he promises Victor that if he does this thing for him, he will never resort to violence, and given how much he has hated the repercussions of it and his values of how humans should behave, I doubt he will break that promise. Lastly, everytime he has come in contact with humans, it had resulted in running away in fear and ultimately getting very very hurt.

Word Count: 117

Reply
Maria Gugelberg von Moos
12/6/2020 04:56:55 pm

The reason why I thought of offspring was because the creature appeared to want to have a loving family beside him. Perhaps having a companion wouldn't be enough and he would long to have a child of his own. I am aware that he promised to Victor that he wouldn't resort to violence but there is always a possibility. From my understanding, he hadn't run in fear every time he came in contact with humans. As a result of his hatred towards Frankenstein, he had killed William. That hatred was so strong that he was able to do something as intense as that. I'm sure that he still holds that resentment in his heart and is able to bring it out when initiated.

Word count: 123

Mercy B. Jackson
12/6/2020 03:15:40 pm

I agree with the fact that the creature's plea was reasonable, but I disagree with your decision to deny the request. The monster compromised to be peaceful and move far away if Frankenstein did what he asked, so if you were him, why wouldn't you do it to prevent further harm? Also, if you were Frankenstein, and you were that worried about the creature and him mate reproducing, you could just make the proper adjustments when building the female body to prevent that from happening, right?

Reply
Maria Gugelberg von Moos
12/6/2020 05:09:00 pm

I had only thought of how the creature was able to kill if motivated. There aren't many possibilities where this could happen in the future but it's an important detail. The creature is able to harm human beings if his resentment towards them is strong enough. If I were Frankenstein, I honestly wouldn't be able to trust he wouldn't create harm since he killed my brother. I hadn't thought about creating the female creature without reproductive organs. With this in mind, I think that it would be nice to give the creature a female companion. However, there is a risk they could work together, bound by love, and do what it takes to get that revenge. Part of me believes that the creature will stick to his word while another part believes that he will just take Frankenstein's compliance to do as he says as an invitation to wreak havoc.

Word count: 150

Eliza Walker Dunbar
12/6/2020 10:53:11 pm

I think this is now getting into a nature v. nurture conversation. Was the creature created to be evil or was that a product of being neglected? Would the creature's companion be a monster or would the creature's love soften her heart? Would their offspring be born vile or would it be taught? Isn't there always the chance that his companion could teach their children not to fear humans as would have very little experiences with humans, good or bad. If Frankenstein did actually go through with creating a second creature it's possible that the creature might see humans in a different way, because this would be an example of Frankenstein doing something nice for the creature. I think there are too many unknowns, which is likely why Frankenstein decided to stop. This could've gone well but it could've took a turn for the worst just as easily.

Word Count: 148

Reply
Eliza Walker Dunbar
12/5/2020 05:36:49 am

I personally think the creature's argument was fair. Any time he tries to reach out to a human he's yelled at, called names, and/or shot at. When that little girl was drowning he saved her life, and instead of praise he received a gunshot wound. Due to his appearance, because he looks different from the "norm", he's never going to be loved the way he wants to be. In his argument the creature used pathos, pointing out the fact that all of this is because of Frankenstein, and he promised to flee the country and leave mankind alone. The creature says "I intend to reason ... for you do not reflect that you are the cause of its excess ... If you consent, neither you nor any other human being shall ever see us again (Shelley 130)." This made Frankenstein feel like there was "some justice to his argument (Shelley 130)", like as his creator he owes him happiness.

If I were Frankenstein I would've created the creature a companion. The creature made it quite clear that he wouldn't be in this situation if it weren't for Frankenstein, and he honestly does not want to live like that. Which I think is understandable, he has no one in this world, he has nothing. I understand why Frankenstein agrees at first, but I don't understand why he later changes his mind. Although the fear of a "devil race' is reasonable, as a scientist he could've taken precautions to prevent that while still fulfilling his end of the deal. I guess Victor isn't as smart as he thinks he is.

Word Count: 267

Reply
Bessie Downse
12/5/2020 01:59:26 pm

I agree with your statement; the reason why his life is this way, is because of Victor. By making him feel bad, the creature creates a great argument. I loved the way you included pathos in your argument. That really ties it into real world conflicts and adds another great aspect of literature and analysis. I wish you elaborate a little more on it more. You could have included something like: May Shelley chose to use pathos while writing the creature’s argument to show just how much sadness he had in his everyday life and wanted Victor Frankenstein to pity him so much that he agreed to his demands.

Word Count: 109

Reply
Mercy B. Jackson
12/6/2020 03:04:40 pm

I completely agree with everything you said, especially the part about Victor not always thinking things through, or considering all of his options. He could avoid the monsters having offspring by simply not giving the female reproductive organs. Furthermore, Frankenstein creating a living being and doing absolutely nothing to teach or care for it only led to distress and hurt for not only the creature, but other humans as well. It seems pretty obvious to me that the only way to get rid of this problem is to try treating this creature with he respect it deserves for being forced to live his life. Unfortunately, Frankenstein doesn't share this view.

Reply
Fanny Rysan Mulford Hitchcock
12/6/2020 06:23:52 pm


To me, it seems as if Frankenstein was not afraid of creating a “monster race” but rather was concerned for selfish reasons. He couldn’t handle his first creation. How would he be able to take care of another one?

Perhaps, in the back of his mind, he was afraid of the consequences and was concerned he would create the leaders of a dangerous crime ring, but he knew what happened after he created his first creature. He could not go through that again. There was no way he could listen to another story about how his abandonment led to him discovering love.

Love is not something one should have to discover. Love should be inherent in a family, and the fact that the Creature has to ask Frankenstein to create love rather than just asking Frankenstein to love him shows how almost materialistic love can truly be.

Word Count: 147

Reply
Gertrud Woker
12/9/2020 01:02:15 pm

I agree with your statement. One thing that I think contributes an interesting perspective to the discussion is that of Frankenstein's God complex. We already know that he had a great upbringing, surrounded by parents who loved him and essentially treated him like a god. Further in life, his deep study and understanding of Anatomy, Physiology, and Alchemy caused him to bring together dead body parts and create new life. However, I think his parents' treatment of him as a child also contributed to his initial belief that he held the power of Life in one hand, and Death in the other. He thought he could attain anything, even the creation of an entirely new being. So, when Frankenstein's creature asked him to create a companion, regardless of the convincing that the creature made, I think it would be fair to assume that Frankenstein would've made a mate for his creature solely on the basis that he was a god and could do whatever he wanted.

Reply
Mercy B. Jackson
12/6/2020 02:49:09 pm

I think that the creature's request of Frankenstein was reasonable.
This monster had to go through excruciating physical, mental, and emotional turmoil, all because he was forced into his own hideous existence. Of course, he made some mistakes (like literally murdering another person), but he had nothing besides literature, eavesdropping on conversations, and his own experiences to teach him how to deal with his emotions in a correct manner. He saw the joys that came with love, acceptance, and family, and he truly believed that the only way he could have that for himself was by forcing his creator to give him a mate (because it's not like Frankenstein was going to do it willingly in the first place). It would be extremely relieving to have someone to love, and that would love him back, especially if that person looked like him. If I were Frankenstein, I would agree to his request, but I think it would also be wise to educate him, as well as his mate, on morality. The creature's hateful actions stemmed from neglect, and it would only do more harm to not teach them about decency.

The creature's offspring might be dangerous if the monster's violent tendencies are learned. However, all the creature wants to do is be happy with a family of his own, so it is very likely that once him and his mate depart, they will have Iittle to no contact with humans, so the threat is relieved. If they do eventually encounter any people, they might react unpredictably, which is why I think it is important to improve the creature's impression of the human race and teach him to be civil, so that no one is harmed.

Reply
Mercy B. Jackson
12/6/2020 03:16:53 pm

Word count: 285

Reply
Fanny Rysan Mulford Hitchcock
12/6/2020 06:08:13 pm

Personally, I am not sure the Creature considered having offspring. He just wanted to be loved, and believes that being in some sort of relationship with someone like him will help him adjust to society. He's not really looking ahead into the future. His suffering needs to be assuaged. Having Frankenstein fulfill his request will allow him to achieve the instant gratification he has been desiring for so long. It's like if you have $100 and you find something you want to purchase now, but rather you could have invested that money and let it make more money.

His female companion is not so he is permanently happy, it is so he is not tempted to kill again and ruin Frankenstein’s life.

Word Count: 122

Reply
Eliza Walker Dunbar
12/6/2020 10:28:05 pm

I agree, I think it is very important that the creature is taught civility, and I think it's Frankenstein's responsibility to teach him that. The creature sees humans in a bad light, any contact he's had with them seems to go in an unfavorable way. This could really be a turning point for his perspective of humans. Frankenstein could take this opportunity to parent the creature, to show him some kindness even if it's not love. This could show the creature that not all humans are bad, which might change the way he would raise kids if given the opportunity. However, I do also agree with Fanny's response, I don't think the creature was really thinking about having kids because he is still sort of in a childlike mindset. He seems like he's searching for the affection of a parent or wife rather than the affection of his own child.

Word Count: 150

Reply
Anne Elizabeth Ball
12/8/2020 12:36:15 pm

I am really shocked to know that Mary Shelley doesn't mention the monster's sexual needs although he wants a mate for companionship. But whereas, on the other hand, the first letter written by Walton to his sister mentions this desire for companionship as well. Victor has second thoughts only to be moved by the monster's arguments. At this point, Victor and the creature are as equal. But the thing to notice and to emphasize on is that what the monster lacks is a formal education and the knowledge to create his own mate. But at the same time I believe that creature has been through a lot of mental stress and tension and thus Whatever you ask for, you shall receive.

word count: 121

Reply
Getrud Woker
12/6/2020 07:35:52 pm

I believe the creature's request for Frankenstein to make him a make was very reasonable. First and foremost, the creature never asked to be created and then be immediately discarded and abandoned. The creature formulates his arguments in three distinct ways: 1. By making note of the fact that he was shunned by the world, and subsequently becoming lonely. 2. His natural proclivity towards wanting a mate for companionship and to uphold a normal relationship to depart from engaging in violence. 3. Threatening Frankenstein and his family if he didn't give him a mate.
Just the third reason alone should be enough to make Frankenstein agree to such a proposition by the creature. If I were Frankenstein, I would agree to his demands. I would because the creature makes a solid argument. Frankenstein, as the creature's creator, had no right even bringing this creature to life to begin with, ignorant to the experiment's potential consequences. But he did. So, I think it's only right to give him another mate, one that can truly understand him, as the rest of the world wants nothing to do with him, fearing what they don't understand.

Reply
Sofya Kovalevskaya
12/10/2020 06:00:41 am

I strongly agree with your last statement about humans fearing what we don’t understand. This is seen in everyday activities as most people tend to be drawn towards what they are familiar with, instead of something new. This is also a major reason for multiple struggles we face in society currently, majorly, discrimination. Do you think the monster would have been treated differently if the people understood him? I think humans in general don’t like feeling inferior and that is exactly how the monster made them feel, in addition to fear of course. But do you think if all these things remained, just understanding the creature alone would cause them to react differently?

I also like the steps that you elaborated to explain how the creature formulated his request. I would like to know: If you were Frankenstein, and you didn’t know about the creature’s emotions or specific details about the other characters as a reader, would you still readily accept? Given that you don’t really know if the monster is actually going to live up to the threats?

Word Count: 179

Reply
Anne Elizabeth Ball
12/8/2020 12:27:14 pm

The creature tells Victor "You must create a female for me with whom I can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being." Victor refuses and then later changes his mind to the creature's wishes. The creature threatens "I will work at your destruction, nor finish until I desolate your heart, so that you shall curse the hour of your birth." The creature also pleads his case saying, "My creator, make me happy and do not deny my request." The creature promises to move far away from continental Europe to the wilds of South America to basically scare Victor and try to convince him. The creature definitely formulated his argument and was very successful because he connected Victor with emotions which led him to relent his wishes. If I was Frankenstein, I would agree to it just for the sake that I would be the creator of the creature hence, it’s my duty to fulfill his wishes. Especially because the creature looks like a monster, he is treated as one despite his initial existence, and so he becomes one. Because Victor looks like an angel, he is treated as one despite being a monster, and he never grows and changes.

word count: 203

Reply
Getrud Woker
12/9/2020 12:26:26 pm

I like how you connected Frankenstein and the creature's emotions and how they were treated by society turning them into what they are. The creature was treated like a monster by everyone around him, obviously including Frankenstein. As you put it, "he is treated as one despite his initial existence, and so he becomes one." He never would've become one if everyone treated him with respect and accepted him for who he was. But it's not a perfect world. And Frankenstein was held in high regard, basically treated as perfect. I think Frankenstein would've been even more remiss if he had not decided to craft the creature a companion. Frankenstein already made the creature's life torment, it would be stupid not even to acknowledge his demand.

Word Count: 126

Reply
Sofya Kovalevskaya
12/10/2020 05:38:02 am

After the monster was created, most human interactions usually left him hurt, be it physically or emotionally. Even with the De Laceys, he found out that they didn’t really need him anymore and that broke his heart. Even after he saved a girl, the villagers were still referring to him as a monster. Given this unfair treatment and the lack of love or affection during his upbringing, it is only fair that the creature yearned for a companion so that he would be loved. The creature is able to successfully formulate a very professional and reasonable format to make this request. He makes multiple promises and even vows not to come back into the life of Frankenstein after he received his mate.

I would agree to creating a mate for the monster. The monster had enough time to think about his request, meaning it wasn’t just made up out of excitement or his emotions at the sight of his creator. After Frankenstein refuses to create a mate for the monster, the latter seems to keep the multiple promises he made to Frankenstein to destroy the latter’s life and steal his joy, thereby serving as some form of assurance that if Frankenstein had created the mate, the monster would’ve kept his promise. In case the monster doesn’t keep his promise, the lives of many are at risk, however, after watching Frankenstein slowly fall apart, for the sake of the life and sanity of multiple families, I would be willing to take that risk.

Word Count: 252

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Blog Post Rubric

    Picture

    Archives

    February 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    A Doll's House
    Afghanistan
    Anton Chekhov
    As I Lay Dying
    A Thousand Splendid Suns
    Barbara Kingsolver
    Biology
    Charlotte Bronte
    Class Division
    Community
    Congo/Zaire
    Contrasts
    Cormac McCarthy
    Critical Lens
    Cross Cultural Misconceptions
    Cross-Cultural Misconceptions
    Dystopia
    Ethics
    Family
    Frankenstein
    Gateshead
    Gender Roles
    Gender Study
    Hamlet
    Henrik Ibsen
    Hesitation
    Hope And Despair
    Hubris
    Humanity
    Imagery
    Imagination
    Independent Reading
    Jane Eyre
    Khaled Hosseini
    Literary Analysis
    Literature
    Mary Shelley
    Morality
    Objectivity V. Subjectivity
    Parent Child Relationships
    Parent-Child Relationships
    Perseverance
    Perspective
    Pleasure Reading
    Poetry
    Psychology
    Radiolab
    Reading
    Relationships
    Religion
    Right Vs. Wrong
    Ritual
    Rudy Francisco
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge
    Sanity
    Science
    Shelter
    Soliloquy
    Suspense
    Symbolism
    Tennyson
    The Lady With The Little Dog
    The Poisonwood Bible
    The Rime Of The Ancient Mariner
    The Road
    Ulysses
    Virtual Poetry Unit
    Week 1 Poetry Activity
    William Faulkner
    Women's Roles

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Class Blogs
    • Academic Focus Class Blog
    • English IV Class Blog Period D
    • AP Literature Class Blog Period E
    • English IV Class Blog Period F
  • For Your Viewing Pleasure
  • Contact Me
    • About Me...
  • There There